T1-MMT GROUP exchange Exhibition and Symposium

GROUP exchange is the 2nd Tamworth Textile Triennial, currently on tour including recently at UTS (art.uts.edu.au/index.php/exhibitions/group-exchange-2nd-tamworth-textile-triennial/)

I found myself looking at the exhibition and the individual works through a number of lenses – themes and questions developed by the curator; the individual artworks and artists; extra information and threads from the half day symposium; recent exercises in my OCA course; and my personal responses and the impact of all of these.

Cecilia Heffer, the curator, presented a number of themes within the exhibition, the catalogue and the symposium.

  • Collaboration, with other artists, with materials, with the environment, with community…
  • Textile thinking or the textile approach. Is this different to other disciplines? What can be found in an inter-disciplinary approach?
  • Textile expertise – dedication to particular techniques or the increasingly common mixed approach.
  • Poetry – flights of imagination, or more literally with a number of exhibits which related to texts.
  • Kath Inglis  Mineral Nation (2014) PVC, silver

    Kath Inglis
    Mineral Nation
    (2014) PVC, silver

    Heffer deliberately questioned? challenged? the notion of “textiles”. Is Kath Inglis’ coloured hand cut and carved Polyvinyl Chloride a textile? There are some looped (stitched) connections formed with sterling silver. Does that change your response? I think it is a little provocative, a discussion starter. It extends the meaning of “textile” beyond common use, and of course that’s how language develops and changes. Is it a useful change, providing us with new insights? If you believe boundaries between disciplines are blurring then less distinct, less descriptive/prescriptive meanings could be useful. If there is blurring will “textiles” be a useful term at all, or will it be subsumed into something else? Such as “mixed media”.

    I’ve chosen a few works which seem particularly relevant to my current development, interests and studies.

    Lorna Murray Making Space 2014 Detail, inset full view

    Lorna Murray
    Making Space
    Detail, inset full view

    Lorna Murray Making Space detail 2014

    Lorna Murray
    Making Space detail

    Lorna Murray invited us into the studio and identity of a textile artist. Ephemeral, throwaway materials were transformed in a quirky and delightful way. Wood was carved into traditional textile tools. Colourful cocktail umbrellas were deconstructed and became spools of thread, or stitched into a faceted fabric that stretched across the work bench and into a roll. Fresh from my folding experiments I itched to create new structures with those triangular segments. Murray’s work celebrated the traditional in a very modern way.

    Jemima Parker undefined objects 2014

    Jemima Parker
    undefined objects

    Jemima Parker undefined objects 2014

    Jemima Parker
    undefined objects detail

    Jemima Parker’s work undefined objects at first glance may seem very close to some of the surface distortion I have been exploring with OCA. There is pleating and with individual items strong dimensionality. Her statement references the art / fashion boundaries, garment and body adornment, functionality. However I didn’t find it intriguing. Perhaps it was the rather static placement on the walls, bland lighting and limited colours evenly distributed. Somehow surface distortion became flat. The glimpse of Anitia Larkin’s The breath between us around the corner, tempted me to pass on swiftly.

    Mandy Gunn Centro-polis 2014

    Mandy Gunn

    Mandy Gunn

    Mandy Gunn
    Centro-polis detail

    I’ve mentioned Mandy Gunn’s work in a previous post (7-May-2015) when I was cutting and layering corrugated cardboard. Gunn’s work uses recycled shopping bags on cardboard construction.
    8 shaft colour & weave

    8 shaft colour & weave

    This work references weaving, reminding me of a colour and weave sampler from the past (8-November-2008).
    This linking of textiles, textile sensibilities, with mixed media illustrates the power of discounting traditional disciplinary boundaries. There’s also a modern nod to concerns about recycling, consumerism (all those shopping bags) and collaboration (in the sourcing of materials).

    Gillian Lavery Pranayama (detail, reverse) 2014

    Gillian Lavery
    Pranayama (detail, reverse)

    Above to the left is a detail of the front stitching of Pranayama, a work by Gillian Lavery. On the right a sneaked view of the back.

    This was a pool of stillness in the exhibition. A length of light silk, slightly swaying in the breeze of air-conditioning and passing viewers. Nearby was a small screen showing a looped stop-motion video of the work as it was being made.

    Each day for a year Lavery measured a length of black cotton thread, reaching from mouth to belly button and back. She stitched in a spiral, focusing on her breathing, her thoughts sometimes wandering, until an alarm sounded at ten minutes. The remaining thread was pulled through the back and left. Cotton weights stitch length varied as the breath of ten minutes each day was experienced and observed, as the stitches spiraled outwards.

    I wanted to see the back, those hanging threads of time expired. I gently blew to move the fabric away from the wall so I could see and take my photograph.

    I think this is one of the most pure textile works I have ever seen. An idea. A length of fabric. Threads. A needle and embroidery hoop. A needlewoman. Time. Breath.

    It’s a seductive work. A dangerous one. It makes me wonder about what we’re all doing. Racing around, crossing boundaries, seeking new materials and processes and combinations, telling ourselves “cross disciplinary designers” can discover what dedicated in depth study can miss. We favour the unfamiliar, the exotic, “originality”. We see fads, fashions, and the perversely different for the sake of being different. We want to do everything – and do it in a way its never been done before.

    That last paragraph is quite misleading and unfair. Her website bio states “Gillian Lavery’s art practice is a process-based drawing practice informed by her background in textile art.” (http://www.gillianlavery.com/bio/). Crumbling barriers open new paths. I just want to be sure to take a breath every now and then.

    T1-MMT GROUP exchange Exhibition and Symposium
    Textiles 1 – Mixed Media for Textiles
    Part 1: Surface Distortion

    Leave a Reply

    Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

    WordPress.com Logo

    You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

    Twitter picture

    You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

    Facebook photo

    You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

    Connecting to %s

    This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.


    No Instagram images were found.

    Calendar of Posts

    May 2015
    M T W T F S S

    Enter your email address to follow this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.



    %d bloggers like this: